Timeline for How to prevent "Why is my question being closed?" and User Frustration?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
35 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 17:21 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 29, 2011 at 10:38 | answer | added | Homde | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 27, 2011 at 19:15 | vote | accept | Tamara Wijsman | ||
| Jun 27, 2011 at 19:12 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 919 characters in body
|
| Jan 19, 2011 at 21:19 | vote | accept | Tamara Wijsman | ||
| Jun 27, 2011 at 19:07 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2010 at 16:06 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | Seems like this question might give a response I was looking for. | |
| Nov 24, 2010 at 14:53 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 196 characters in body
|
| Nov 6, 2010 at 17:45 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | I don't see how a shorter question can lead to a better discussion. If there is less to discuss, then the results won't be better... I made it a little shorter and moved the image around. | |
| Nov 4, 2010 at 15:22 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 6 characters in body; deleted 14 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2010 at 15:02 | comment | added | David Thornley | @TomWij: That's really not what it looks like. If you want a good discussion, clean up the question. Drop the early part between the two horizontal dividers; that's just complaining. In your questions about what to do, keep the questions, lose the explanatory text. You don't start a good discussion by telling people what the discussion's about. Your last-line edit is a good one. | |
| Nov 3, 2010 at 22:00 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @DavidThornley: The first part is research showing that the issue exists and is a large enough reason for a discussion like this to exist, the second part are thoughts on how we could solve this. That isn't an irrelevant story, instead it is homework to start a great discussion. I've clarified the last line a bit, together with the title it shouldn't be ambiguous... | |
| Nov 3, 2010 at 21:58 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body; added 60 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2010 at 19:35 | answer | added | Michael K | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 3, 2010 at 19:28 | comment | added | David Thornley | If the title and last line are the only things relevant to the question, why all the tl;dr in the middle? You seem to be saying that a lot of people think questions here are closed too readily, and you could do that with a lot fewer words. Your last line is four different questions, some of them ambiguous. | |
| Nov 1, 2010 at 15:40 | comment | added | Inaimathi | +1 I found this question by following a link from "Why should we have to battle to keep questions open? [closed]". That about says it all. | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 18:46 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 544 characters in body; added 175 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 13:43 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 13:41 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | I don't think we should be closing questions just because the user was incapable of typing a proper question in the title rather than a subject. E-mails, Forums, Documents also require subjects as their title; so it really isn't strange that a lot of users also use subjects here... | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 13:38 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | It isn't ambiguous, it's about closed questions that lead into user frustration. It isn't vague, there is enough information provided and the title and last line are clear. It isn't incomplete, there is enough information provided. It isn't broad, it's about closed questions that lead into user frustration. And it isn't rhetorical, as if it would be then we wouldn't need to do something about it. | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 13:36 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title; edited title
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 13:35 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | Huh... How is this not a real question? See the title and last line. | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 2:22 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 60 characters in body; added 34 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 2:16 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 2:10 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 106 characters in body; deleted 7 characters in body; edited body; added 8 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 2:01 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 1:56 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 482 characters in body; added 48 characters in body; added 107 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 1:44 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
*snip* Removed personal reference to something unrelated.
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 1:07 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 0:57 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Major fault, replaced asking by closing... It would be wrong the other way. xD; added 152 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2010 at 21:17 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2010 at 21:12 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 114 characters in body; added 94 characters in body; added 185 characters in body; deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2010 at 21:06 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 778 characters in body; added 698 characters in body; edited title; added 61 characters in body; added 12 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2010 at 21:01 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 44 characters in body; added 46 characters in body; added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2010 at 20:56 | history | asked | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |