Timeline for Example of incorrect close voting
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2019 at 10:37 | comment | added | Doc Brown | @Ewan: honestly, we can only speculate of what would have happened to the second question if noone had written a good answer so quickly. But to get such kind of answer can definitely help to prove the quality of a question, and that is IMHO fine. I sometimes see questions for which I initially think they are too broad or too opionated for this site. But then someone comes up with a good answer, and gives me a different perspective and may change my mind on this. | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 10:04 | comment | added | Ewan | yes i agree, since the question has a duplicate its somewhat academic what happens to it. Yes it does sound a bit ranty, but if it really comes down to whether a good answer is posted in the first hour and the phrasing of the question. I think we need to change something | |
| Apr 30, 2019 at 10:00 | history | answered | Doc Brown | CC BY-SA 4.0 |