Timeline for Should we force adding a comment with every down-vote?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2010 at 15:28 | history | edited | ManieroMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 15, 2010 at 15:03 | history | edited | Shady M. Najib | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Sep 13, 2010 at 18:22 | comment | added | user8 | Although, I'd argue that this question isn't legitimately worth discussing because it's been hashed to death already. | |
| Sep 13, 2010 at 18:20 | comment | added | user8 | The unofficial policy on Meta.StackOverflow has been that a down vote means "I don't like this idea" not that the question is unclear or not worth discussing. See: Why are people downvoting my question on Meta? | |
| Sep 13, 2010 at 14:20 | answer | added | snmcdonald | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Sep 12, 2010 at 8:06 | vote | accept | Shady M. Najib | ||
| Sep 11, 2010 at 20:18 | comment | added | snmcdonald | @Downvoters. Although I completely disagree with forcing commenting for down voting. I think this is a legitimate discussion. Although it may have been asked on another meta.stackexchange it will not show up on a query here. | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 11:30 | comment | added | ChrisF Mod | Don't forget down-votes on meta sites tend to have addition meanings. Check on Meta.StackOverflow for more discussion on voting habits. | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 7:06 | answer | added | Shady M. Najib | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 7:00 | vote | accept | Shady M. Najib | ||
| S Sep 12, 2010 at 8:06 | |||||
| Sep 10, 2010 at 6:40 | history | edited | Shady M. Najib | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 112 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2010 at 6:25 | answer | added | user8 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 6:22 | comment | added | Shady M. Najib | Best real example on my question is the down-vote this question has now :D | |
| Sep 10, 2010 at 6:14 | history | asked | Shady M. Najib | CC BY-SA 2.5 |