Skip to main content
23 votes

Follow-Up 2: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

I think that this would be good. "Programmers" has always confused me. "Software engineering" is much clearer.
Demi's user avatar
  • 826
20 votes

Follow-Up 3: New Site Name and Help Center Discussions

When I read this post, my initial thought was, "If I upvote this, will it be interpreted as either (a) 'I approve this on-topic list' or (b) 'I approve further discussions of details'." And honestly, ...
scriptin's user avatar
  • 4,432
17 votes

Follow-Up: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

I Love It In short, our scope does in fact have a few small edge cases that are well established but relatively uncommon (Eg. software license questions from the perspective of a software engineer, ...
maple_shaft's user avatar
  • 26.5k
16 votes

Follow-Up 2: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

I like Software Engineering as a title over Programmers. However, I'm not really ok with tagline containing only a reference to 60's-era-introduced, waterfall-type methodology, and also in particular,...
Erik Eidt's user avatar
  • 34.3k
14 votes

Follow-Up 2: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

This proposed tagline and pictorial representation miss the mark in conveying the (current/new) site scope and the new name, "Software Engineering." While I agree that the site scope should include ...
Jerry101's user avatar
  • 5,427
8 votes

Follow-Up: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

I can (and do) certainly back this solution. I particularly like the idea of getting the site scope over in as few words as possible so that we actually stand a chance of getting people to read them. ...
ChrisF's user avatar
  • 38.9k
5 votes

Follow-Up 2: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

(summary of July 29th discussion at Whiteboard) At help/on-topic page... ...bullets in about list look OK to keep as is: software requirements software architecture and design algorithm ...
4 votes

Follow-Up: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

Overall, I like it. The name is 100% spot-on. I think the scope statement is 90% there. I don't like dropping the two topics that are on-topic. I think the most important thing is the site name (and, ...
Thomas Owens's user avatar
  • 83.7k
3 votes

Follow-Up 3: New Site Name and Help Center Discussions

Just one thing here: development methods and practices requirements, architecture, and design quality assurance and testing configuration, build and release management Isn't testing a development ...
null's user avatar
  • 3,636
2 votes

Follow-Up: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

The goal of the participants on Programmers has always been the same: to have a high-quality Q&A. I think we all agree on what that means; we want to attract professionals to the site, help ...
Robert Harvey's user avatar
1 vote

Follow-Up 2: New Site Name and Scope Proposals

Has there been any thought given to the "overlapping" sites? I mean that we will still get some questions that are off-topic and better answered on other sites. Eg Workplace and possibly DBA, ...
gbjbaanb's user avatar
  • 48.6k

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible