I think the deleting and closing of my posts are very much questionable.
And much more examples that are deleted and therefore inaccessible in a regular way.
How unacceptable are questions about software engineering concepts and principles? Although pragmatism is important, concepts and principles have the real best chance to be generalized and applied to real problems. Questions and answers can be conducted with different amount of abstractness or concreteness. Claims that a post is not specific simplify the issue to binary and are very much subjective.
How unacceptable is a post with more than one question marks? In my posts, it is usually a question followed by a rephrasing question, or by some subquetions which serve to clarify the question and to constructively lead other users when they write an answer. They are not independent or unrelated questions. Counting the occurrences of question marks in a post and furthermore accusing the post for asking multiple questions imply that the accuser has no ability or willingness to understand the post, and does not allow unfamiliar or different things to exist.
Regarding the behaviours of some powerful and privileged users including some moderators, being exclusive not inclusive, lack of open-mindedness and empathy, interpretation of policy to own liking, obsession with power and its usage, covering up each other for having the "team" spirit, and lack of being monitored and criticized, effectively undermine our justice and democracy, and lead to obstruction on normal questions and answers. The moderator team doesn't have any mechanism of examining and correcting themselves. The more we users stand up against abuses and look for ways to combat them, the better the community we will have.