I've had a couple of posts recently that really prompt me to question whether Apple still really cares about Unix users. One of these posts was https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/270509/terminal-has-been-unstable-since-last-upgrade-osx-10-12-2; I wrote:
I have had repeated Terminal.app crashes while working with the command line, whether on the local computer or shelled into a Linux VPS.
Is this a known issue? Are there alternative CLI terminal applications that will behave like terminal, only at least being more stable?
Thanks,
@j.c. answered:
To answer your other question: "Is this a known issue?", I have been having problems with Terminal.app crashing too, and this post seems to suggest that the issue is known to Apple.
More recently I posted another issue: there's something called Apache installed, and I can't do an apachectl start
twice without getting an error of /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.apache.httpd.plist: service already loaded
, but I can't for the life of me connect to port 80 on localhost. I posted on apple.SE at https://superuser.com/questions/1185171/how-do-i-get-apache-to-run-from-osx-sierra-10-12-13 :
I've made multiple searches for e.g. "apache Sierra", but haven't been able to find my issue.
I have a MacBook Pro running OSX Sierra 10.12.13, and it seems to have some version of Apache installed, but I can't connect on port 80 (or 443), either with a browser, or by running
telnet localhost 80
. If I runapachectl restart
, it runs without reported error; if I runapachectl stop
it runs without reported error; if I runapachectl start
when I think Apache is running, it gives an error message,/System/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.apache.httpd.plist: service already loaded
. Awhich apachectl
gives/usr/sbin/apachectl
, so I believe I'm running OSX's native Apache and not a version pulled in from Homebrew.What can/should I be doing so that Apache is running normally?
Thanks,
After the question was old enough to be eligible for bounty, and I had gotten off the phone with Apple technical support, I flagged it for moderator attention and requested migration to ServerFault.
In the technical support call, which lasted a bit short of an hour, I was escalated twice; even the first escalation was with someone who didn't know the command line and didn't know what Apache was. I was told that Apple offers Server which may include Apache, installable from the store, and supported GUI-driven use of Server, but Apple technical support does not offer help for the command line or command-line-driven Apache setup and configuration file editing.
Those both look like significant red flags. It's mainstream for users who want Macs to offer Unix functionality to want a stable Terminal.app and it's mainstream for web developers to want a working Apache installation on their box even if it's not shared.
Now I know that MacOS and iOS, with their NSString
s, owe a nearly indelible debt to Unix. And there are workarounds, like iTerm2 and Homebrew or source builds of Apache, and I'm using iTerm2 and plan on building another Apache. But I see ominous writing on the wall; it seems that Apple is losing its respect for hackerdom.
Are there other examples or signs that Apple is dropping care for Unix hackers?