This question is prompted by some of the discussion in How can we avoid turning off potential participants who see the wall of Closed questions? Specifically, what MichaelT wrote to JensG and the comment Telastyn left on the bottom.
Is that a good question?
When I first read it, its score was well into the negative (-4 or lower, don't remember). It was immediately pointed out how it was a duplicate and I'm sure it had 1 or 2 close votes, although those are now gone. Interestingly enough, data explorer query for that question shows that its score never dipped below -1, which I'm guessing is due to some of the original downvoters changing their minds and removing their downvote, unfortunately the schema doesn't track deleted up/down votes.
So as maintainers of P.SE content and upholders of FAQ (Is that the ultimate decision source?), what is our stance on such questions? If you are bad, you are bad and we shall close you? Or do the answers on the page have some leverage?
I'm not questioning the up/down vote system. I think that's great. Bad stuff gets low score, good stuff gets high score. But if this question was closed as fast as some of the others I've seen, as JensG would put it, it would just get "voted to an early death".
The other part, I'm not quite sure about (maybe this should be a separate post, and if so I can separate it), we close what's considered low-quality questions so they don't pollute the... question-space(?) but they are all still there. Hence what some refer to as "a wall", although some others have never seen one. So the closure doesn't actually remove the pollution, it just prevents a not so good question from potentially receiving a really good answer that could benefit the community.
I apologize in advance to the moderators if this is a noob question that has already been discussed and settled. I've been a member for a while now, but my involvement has mostly been drive-by posts here and there. I do appreciate the time and effort you guys are putting into keeping up this site.