9

https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/180588/31260

Above answer has been made CW per automatic rule (quote source):

The post has been edited ten (10) times by the original owner.

Automatically applying generic rule in this particular case looks unfair.
In case of doubt, check the answer contents and revisions history to decide whether you agree with above.

Answer looks exceptionally good and revisions (all made by author) look like substantially adding a value.

Is it possible to clear CW status to recognize an extraordinary contribution of the author?

11

This might be a good example of an unfair CW, every edit added something valuable to the answer and there doesn't seem to be a series of minor edits that would point to rep whoring. Furthermore all edits are by the answer's author, I don't see any reason to encourage collaboration, which is what CW is supposed to be about. Also, it's worth pointing out that the author continued adding valuable information to the answer even after it was turned to CW.

I'd like to wait a day or two to see if anyone objects, I might have missed something. If there are no objections, I'll remove the CW status.

  • 2
    +1 - Have my support. I'll wait for CW to be removed and then +1 him so he gets the juicy reps for the good work – Deco Jan 28 '13 at 12:28
  • at +7/-0, it looks like your plan has a solid community support :) – gnat Jan 29 '13 at 19:57
  • Looks like it's done. Thanks Yannis! – Deco Jan 30 '13 at 0:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .