3

This question was closed for being an exact duplicate, but I modified it extensively so that it now discusses a particular condition to wrapping third party code.

In its previous condition the question was too generic and may have been indeed a duplicate.

| |
  • 2
    In the future, don't remove the "duplicate of" link, even if you've made edits. It'll make it easier to find what it was originally considered a duplicate of and determine if it's different enough. – Thomas Owens Nov 6 '12 at 17:24
  • @ThomasOwens sorry for that, will be more careful next time. – Songo Nov 6 '12 at 18:49