I have tried to edit this question (closed by one moderator vote):
to be as clear as possible and most importantly to be objective AND to address specific concerns raised by the moderator in comments.
However, the question remains unopened despite my flagging it for moderator re-review, with no moderator feedback.
So, my meta question is:
- What specifically is the deficiency in the updated wording of the question which makes it not satisfy "six guidelines for constructive subjective questions"?
- What possible areas of fixing are suggested?
Thanks in advance.
Please note that empirically, it's very hard to claim that the question as worded can not be answered not-too-poorly, since it DOES have an answer (disclaimer: mine) upvoted 4 times despite pretty narrow target audience (it's limited to Perl).