Timeline for How to improve our style for reacting on "low quality questions"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 14, 2016 at 15:04 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | what is on topic == site scope | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 13:46 | comment | added | user22815 | @RobertHarvey the closest I think I come to that is "Before showing the list of what is on-topic, the first thing we encounter on that page is our intended audience" followed by a discussion of the site's audience, posted to a question stating that we users need to do a better job with how we react to low-quality questions. I am not sure what site scope has to do with anything here, or how I could improve my answer based on your feedback. | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 5:45 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | You featured it prominently in your answer, coupled to a discussion about site scope. | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 5:44 | comment | added | user22815 | @RobertHarvey did I make that assertion? I just skimmed through this answer I do not believe I mentioned the tagline or even the word "scope" anywhere in my answer. | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 5:40 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | FWIW, the tagline for Programmers (questions about conceptual programming topics) really doesn't say anything at all about the site scope. There isn't anything useful that a new user can divine about the scope of the site by reading that phrase. | |
| Mar 13, 2016 at 20:06 | history | answered | user22815 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |