Timeline for Migrating Crap to SO. Really, Programmers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Oct 17, 2014 at 12:36 | comment | added | gnat | @jwenting CR can't be in the list while it's still in beta. As for close option for h/w dumps, I personally prefer dealing with these in a way that doesn't involve spending close votes, as it scales better (imagine 20-30-40 suckers from the whole class dropping their dumps at us in a day - that could simply go over close limits) | |
| Oct 17, 2014 at 12:25 | comment | added | jwenting | main problem is that there's only "SO" to choose from in the "would fit better on another site" category. Adding CR, superuser, and maybe some others to the list might be a good idea. And a close option "very low quality, blatant request for code/homework" might be a good idea as well (right now those get flagged for migration to SO and might well make it there). | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 15:49 | history | answered | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |