Timeline for Dupe holding a question that is more general
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 7, 2014 at 22:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/497506497346416640 | ||
| Aug 5, 2014 at 13:55 | answer | added | Rachel | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 5, 2014 at 12:12 | comment | added | gnat | thanks should really go to Robert Harvey, as it was he who challenged the approach and raised MSE discussion to clarify it | |
| Aug 5, 2014 at 11:46 | comment | added | maple_shaft Mod | @gnat I am more interested in discussing the general approach. Thanks for posting the MSE discussion. This is important for our community to make the right decision. | |
| Aug 5, 2014 at 11:45 | history | edited | maple_shaftMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 452 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2014 at 11:20 | comment | added | gnat | are you more interested in discussing specific-question, or more general approach? I ask because for the latter, it can make sense to refer MSE discussion that was raised as a follow-up to one of similar past cases at Programmers: Does the new guidance on duplicate questions suggest closing a question as duplicate, if the original answers the OP's question? | |
| Aug 5, 2014 at 11:13 | history | asked | maple_shaftMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |