Skip to main content
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

A questionquestion was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQFAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation???

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation???

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation???

bumping
Source Link
Walter
  • 16.1k
  • 17
  • 19

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation???

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation?

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation???

added 67 characters in body
Source Link
Dynamic
  • 5.8k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 27

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag career development and career-transition.

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation?

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag career development and career-transition.

After a quick scan of both tags I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation?

A question was asked today that was a rant followed by a request for career advice on what the OP should do next. @Oded handled commenting to the OP that such questions were off-topic according to the FAQ and the OP justified the question

since I can use the tag and .

After a quick scan of both tags ( and ) I found that the majority of both contain closed questions and another fair amount that can be retagged.

Is there value in having these two tags if the FAQ clearly states that the site is not about career advice, salary or compensation?

Source Link
Walter
  • 16.1k
  • 17
  • 19
Loading