Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:37 comment added yannis Mod @MarkTrapp "High level program design" is on topic, but I'm still not convinced the question qualifies as such.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:21 comment added user8 @Starx thanks for updating your question: I voted to re-open it.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:20 comment added user8 @YannisRizos You can pedantically insist that development methodologies means something very specific and anyone who uses it in a colloquial sense is wrong, but the sense in which it was used here—to mean "high level program design"—is still on-topic.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:15 comment added Starx @YannisRizos, Great!!! Then reopen the question and lets read some answers now.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:11 comment added yannis Mod @Starx Now we are getting somewhere! You told us why the two solutions don't work for you, and you've further defined the problem. You are not simply looking for the incredibly vague "best" and by giving us detailed explanations of why the two methods don't work for you, you've stopped people from proposing other methods that have the same problems.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:07 comment added Starx @Mark, Its good to listen to a second opinion. I too believed that my question was asking for conceptual techniques (which you said as high-level design advice), please review the question and tell me If I need to others as well.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:05 comment added Starx @YannisRizos, I dont know why what I have tried is important to the question I am asking. But to acknowledge Mark's Support I have added them.
Oct 12, 2012 at 10:01 comment added yannis Mod Programmers is a site for professional software developers, I don't think following the formal definition of development methodology is unreasonable. If the OP actually addresses "what have you tried", that would mean that he tried to apply both solutions, and didn't get the expected results. Then, certainly, we'd have an actual and practical problem on our hands, and not just a quest for the best/most proper solution to a (currently) non existing problem...
Oct 12, 2012 at 9:44 history edited user8 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 223 characters in body
Oct 12, 2012 at 9:35 history answered user8 CC BY-SA 3.0