5 replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link
4 replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link
3 replaced http://meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link

A little background on the bounty:

Earlier today I closed the question referenced in this Meta questionthis Meta question, which is the same question @karlphillip mentions on his bounty. He felt he should award one last bounty to one of the answerers, but as the question was closed I advised him to find another one of the answerer's answers, on an open question, and award the bounty there. Didn't really want to re-open the original question for 24 hours, as we both agreed on the closure.

Obviously that failed miserably since he chose an even more close worthy question to set the bounty on ;P That's on me, I should have mentioned that he should find a good on topic question as I'm painfully aware that there are still a lot of open questions that don't belong to the site. Apologies for that.

Back to the question in question:

I agree that it's off topic and the proper way to handle this would be to refund the bounty and close the question. If no one objects though, I'd prefer to wait for 5 hours for @karlphillip to award the bounty and then close it.


Closed.

A little background on the bounty:

Earlier today I closed the question referenced in this Meta question, which is the same question @karlphillip mentions on his bounty. He felt he should award one last bounty to one of the answerers, but as the question was closed I advised him to find another one of the answerer's answers, on an open question, and award the bounty there. Didn't really want to re-open the original question for 24 hours, as we both agreed on the closure.

Obviously that failed miserably since he chose an even more close worthy question to set the bounty on ;P That's on me, I should have mentioned that he should find a good on topic question as I'm painfully aware that there are still a lot of open questions that don't belong to the site. Apologies for that.

Back to the question in question:

I agree that it's off topic and the proper way to handle this would be to refund the bounty and close the question. If no one objects though, I'd prefer to wait for 5 hours for @karlphillip to award the bounty and then close it.


Closed.

A little background on the bounty:

Earlier today I closed the question referenced in this Meta question, which is the same question @karlphillip mentions on his bounty. He felt he should award one last bounty to one of the answerers, but as the question was closed I advised him to find another one of the answerer's answers, on an open question, and award the bounty there. Didn't really want to re-open the original question for 24 hours, as we both agreed on the closure.

Obviously that failed miserably since he chose an even more close worthy question to set the bounty on ;P That's on me, I should have mentioned that he should find a good on topic question as I'm painfully aware that there are still a lot of open questions that don't belong to the site. Apologies for that.

Back to the question in question:

I agree that it's off topic and the proper way to handle this would be to refund the bounty and close the question. If no one objects though, I'd prefer to wait for 5 hours for @karlphillip to award the bounty and then close it.


Closed.

2 added 16 characters in body
source | link
1
source | link