Timeline for Reason to Reject Flagged Edits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2011 at 22:23 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @thelq the bar is fairly low; failure to substantially improve the post is overt laziness. Also, turd polishing as a practice is masturbatory nonsense I actively want to discourage. Making a terrible post 10% better is a waste of everyone's time: yours, mine, and the original poster's too. | |
| Feb 21, 2011 at 21:12 | comment | added | TheLQ | So you rather absolutely nothing be done about it since not everyone has the time to substantially fix people's posts? A series of small edits does much more than an non-existent person that will fix everything | |
| Feb 19, 2011 at 12:54 | comment | added | Walter | absolutely love the term "turd-polishing". | |
| Feb 19, 2011 at 1:29 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |